- Comments from Unique1
- Per WP:Record charts the only reliable source for charts is the official chart provider themselves.
- Equally we only accept certificates sourced from the certificate provider.
- Furthermore the majority of this article is sourced from blabbermouth.net. I'm not sure how reliable the site is but either way I don't think good articles should heavily rely on one source are not good examples of referencing. It is never good if an article uses a particular website a lot.
- Blabbermouth.net is an established, third-party website in it's respectful field, and is parented by Roadrunner Records. I don't see how using a particular source in an article makes the article less reliable… CrowzRSA 19:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That was what I was not sure about. But I feel more assured now. However I still urge you to try and find some other alternative sources as the article is heavily reliant on Blabbermouth.net. Yet I will not see this as an issue in my saying: I don't object to the article now being promoted. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 19:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Infoboxes should only have one release date.
- The background and release section reads like a diary... "on this date..." and "on this date..."
- The contents section are not sourced and the use of four columns is discouraged as it will not appear properly on people who use a computer with a smaller screen resolution.
- The RIAA and Allmusic references are improperly formatted, they're missing publishers etc. RIAA could also be linked. The Stylus Magazine reference is missing an accessdate. Reference 19 (chartifacts) has an inconsistent date format with the rest of the article. -- Lil_℧n
iquℇ №1 [talk] 02:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I fixed the refs you mentioned except for the Stylus reference, per WP:CITEHOW stating that if the article's publish date is given, access date is not required. CrowzRSA 19:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Billboard Music DVD Chart → specify the country. e.g. U.S. Billboard Music DVD Chart
- Why have you listed Hitparade as a chart? Hit parade/Steffun Hung together run the Swiss Album Chart source.
- Additionally you need to link the specific chart page e.g. this not this.
- Also in most cases you've added Music DVD chart at your own discretion but the sources provided simply say the album charted on the country's album chart but doesn't specify any further. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 19:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Just a little comment, there's a dab link in the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:19, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed CrowzRSA 22:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Final things
- Ref 24 and 29 are incorrectly formatted. Scroll down and you'll see what I mean. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 02:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- …Sorry, do you mean that uh,,, I'm bad at this… Sorry CrowzRSA 02:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm itching to give my approval... just a few minor things:
- reference [9] is missing a publisher → Roadrunnerrecords.com (Roadrunner Records)
- ref [17] is missing a link... link About.com.
- In ref number [27].. there is missing a publisher: Prometheus Global Media.
- reference [29] is formatted incorrectly. For some reason the url is showing up bare, instead of a title. Also the publisher should match the publishers listed in other Aria.com sources. None match presently.
- The title actually is the four URLs (see [1]). I don't know if I should change it since it is the actual title… As for the aria thing, I think it's fixed. CrowzRSA 03:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ahh i've seen this before with ARIA... yeah I'd change to "ARIA Charts - Accreditations - 2010 DVDs" as this is more inline with the title's ARIA publishes for singles. I guess its an error? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 03:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sounds about right,,, fixed. CrowzRSA 03:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- reference [33] link unitalicise Allmusic. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 02:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|