Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Starkiller/1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted per consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article contains a lot of primary sources, especially at the fictional history, while some of the claims are unsourced. Article also overrelies on lists, and some of the cited sources do not entirely say what they are cited for. Overall the whole thing needs a vast rewrite. GlatorNator () 22:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.