Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/S.S.C. Napoli/1

S.S.C. Napoli edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Remain listed Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This was first made a GA over a decade ago, when Wikipedia and the club were both very different to how they are today. The history section has, as is always the case, become bloated for the last ten years, and there is a very dry and complicated explanation of the club's folding and rebirth in 2004. Two very detailed Top 20 lists of appearances and goals would be better off on the records article than here. The support section includes a lot of unsourced assumptions about rivalries and friendships. The section on the finances I won't even go into because I'm not an economics professor, but it doesn't look accessible to the common reader. Other tags such as citation needed and clarification needed over the article. Harambe Walks (talk) 20:31, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trimmed some more. Think it is in a position to be kept now. AIRcorn (talk) 10:47, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Keep. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 22:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am ready to close this as keep but courtesy ping of Harambe Walks for thoughts. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 07:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Barkeep49 sorry just seen this now. Yes, all is well due to the work by myself and others. It's a drastically better page to how it was. Please close. Harambe Walks (talk) 22:58, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]