Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Queer Eye/1

Queer Eye edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: failed. Significant issues with GA criteria have been identified and they have not been fixed in a timely fashion. b uidhe 01:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Large sections of this article are severely lacking in sources, meaning that it fails GA criteria 2: Verifiable with no original research. If this article were being nominated right now for a GA review, I believe it would be quick failed for severely lacking in sources. Was GA nominated in 2007, and the unsourced content was added later, but right now it's nowhere near acceptable as a GA. For example:

Format section - completely unsourced
Popular and critical response - two paragraphs completely unsourced
Spin-off series - completely unsourced
International adaptations - some text unsourced, most country's spinoff shows are completely unsourced
Merchandising - four sentences unsourced

All in all, this doesn't meet the standards of verified text required for GA, as there's far too much original research. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per nomination.100cellsman (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I agree, without citations for verification it cannot be a Good Article. Trillfendi (talk) 07:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]