Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Knights of Columbus/1

Knights of Columbus edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: delisted Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, this article was flagged as needing GA reassessment. Judging from the talk page it does not seem that there is a consensus whether it meets the GA criteria in terms of NPOV or covering all significant aspects (with a prose size of 14 kB, I find that doubtful). (t · c) buidhe 05:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wow, this is a mess...
    • "The Knights promote the Catholic view on public policy issues, including opposition to same-sex marriage, abortion, and birth control." -- this info is present in the lead but not in the body, also doubling as a violation of WP:LEADCITE
    • "History" section is woefully short even with the subpage.
    • "Degrees" and "Membership" sections are extremely short.
    • "Emblem of the Order" is entirely sourced to primary sources.
    • Lots of sources are missing publisher/work and access date info.
  • Given that this has been open since October and no one's even touched the GAR, I think it's safe to fast-track this one and delist. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree delist as per TPH above.--Smerus (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]