Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/King Kong (2005 film)/1

King Kong (2005 film) edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page

Result: Keep. No support for the case to delist. Geometry guy 18:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the article is very good, but there aren't enough references in the Release, Cinematic and literary allusions, Musical score, and DVD release sections. Many have too be added; the Extended Edition scenes paragraph has NO references. Also, many of the sections should be merged with more main ones. For example the DVD release section should be merged with the main Release section. Lastly, there are quite a few links that are dead/need fixing. You can see them here. Limetolime ^{Talk to me} ^• ^{look what I did!} 23:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The problems are not enough to merit delisting imo - citations are only required for things likely to be challanged (or quotes / stats etc), even for FA.Yobmod (talk) 13:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. User Alientraveller is addressing some of the nom's concerns, particularly the references. This is likely to be a keeper. Majoreditor (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. Citations have been added. There's room for improvement but at present the article meets or is close to meeting GA requirements. Majoreditor (talk) 17:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. I'm not enthusiastic about the article, partly because of the "References to other versions of King Kong" section, but I agree with others that it now does enough for GA. In particular, low citation density in some sections is not a GA issue, and hasn't been for over a year. Geometry guy 21:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]