Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jutsu (Naruto)/1

Jutsu (Naruto) edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delist _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article doesn't seem to fulfill the Good Article criteria as they currently exist. Its main problem is that most of the references are primary sources and it doesn't have a "broad coverage" per the criteria. The Reception section uses many unreliable sources. Ultimately it appears to be a great deal of plot cruft without much evidence of real world notability that can be accurately verified from the article._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: The article seriously lacks of sources: there're something like 14 or 15 sections without any source, other sections with just one source (incidentally, the manga chapters), and so on for the whole length. Reception section is basically a confusing mix of critical comments about battles and Ninja techniques, and that's completely different (just like the article seems to say) from the Jutsu itself. [E.g.: take the last paragraph, with vague Kimlinger comments.] Some sections (see Rinnegan) are surprisengly long and full of in-universe and irrilevant details.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 09:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: I don't find it too notable considering we could merge its contents with other characters.Tintor2 (talk) 00:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Multiple unsourced paragraphs or statements, and a lack of outside sources. Merging with what sources are good seems the best option for this article's future. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]