Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Izzy Westbury/1

Izzy Westbury edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept Problem sorted AIRcorn (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another of my early Good articles. This one has had some back and forth over the past year; it spent over a year in a similar state to present (with a lot of the GA content removed) before I noticed and restored it. However, my original work isn't that great, and is out of date. The more up-to-date state it is currently in lacks comprehensiveness for GA status, but I'm not really interested in making the two marry up any more. Maybe a happy medium can be found, but not by me. Harrias ^talk 10:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrias: That was strange. It is easy enough to add updated information with out removing the outdated stuff. It is not like the past disappears. In the end there were only one or two short sentences to add to the good article version to bring it in line with current one. Are you happy with this staying a good article. AIRcorn (talk) 04:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem with me. Harrias ^talk 14:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]