Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Homosexual transsexual/2

Homosexual transsexual edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Withdrawn and renominated. Geometry guy 00:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article now meets the good article criteria. This article has undergone massive and agonizing work and improvement. Passionately disagreeing editors have clashed and finally come to a solution for this former good article which is now much better than it was when it was a good article before. The article is comprehensive, yet concise, every claim has a RS reference, the language is as simple as it can be for such a complex topic. A person who has no idea about the subject who reads this article will come away with a good summary understanding of the topic. I feel that aside from minor tweeks no major work is needed on this article in terms of adding any information that is missing, and not covered in some linked article or the other. I am sure this article is not perfect, I am sure it is at least a "Good Article" once more.--Hfarmer (talk) 07:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's good news. But you can simply renominate the article at GAN. Geometry guy 08:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
oh I thought it has to be reassessed.... I guess this is the wrong place so I will close this reassessment.--Hfarmer (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]