Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hello Garci scandal/1

Hello Garci scandal edit

Article (Edit · History) · Article talk (Edit · History) · Watch article · Watch article reassessment page

Result: Delist. Majoreditor (talk) 18:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated this article for GA status on 2006 but sadly it's quality went downhill since there are lots of maintainance tags. --Howard the Duck 05:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delist - Unsourced quotations, Evidence section is mostly unsourced, has outside links in the body of the article, a number of citation needed tags, and the images are in a gallery. Ealdgyth | Talk 16:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Ealdgyth. The citation tags haven't been addressed, and some images are dumped into a slapdash galley. Majoreditor (talk) 03:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. Also has poorly formatted references, and a pop culture section which needs reworking: the prose in the humor section is particularly embarrassing (providing humor in itself). Geometry guy 12:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per sourcing issues articulated above (number of citation tags even seems to warrant quick failure). Additionally, Garci01.jpg‎ does not have FU rationale. ЭLСОВВОLД _talk 00:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. The article hardly has any citations, topping off with only 21 citations (which includes duplicate citations) for the whole article. And the article is not that small where 21 citations would be sufficient. Maybe it should be renominated when more sources are found. Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 20:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think this discussion can be closed. Could someone do it, and give me feedback on the archiving guidelines and procedures. Thanks Geometry guy 22:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. I've followed the archiving instructions (I think) and am crossing my fingers ..... Majoreditor (talk) 18:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]