Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hazel Miner/1

Hazel Miner edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: No action. The article has been rereviewed (and not listed). Geometry guy 19:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it was appropriate to delist this article last fall. I added inline citations but the article is still of the same quality it was when originally assessed. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The GA reassessment was at Talk:Hazel Miner/GA1. As the article currently stands the lede is not really the best summary and fails WP:LEAD, and there are lots of unseemly short paragraphs, for example of one or two sentences length. -- Cirt (talk) 21:53, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This article has since been nominated at WP:GAN, has been reviewed and was not listed. See Talk:Hazel Miner/GA2. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This re-assessment was not templated on the article talk page, which is why I proceeded with the GAN review. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]