Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Final Fantasy Mystic Quest/1

Final Fantasy Mystic Quest edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page
Result: Keep. Article has been fixed and consensus has been reached. Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 17:11, 12 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The article fails Good Article criterion 2 as more than half of its content is unsourced (namely the Gameplay and Plot sections). FightingStreet (talk) 22:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This is a good point, although there is some precedent; The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker does not cite any sources in its Plot or Gameplay sections. —Hydrokinetics12 (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • CommentKeep The source for the Plot and Gameplay section are implicitly the game itself. But it would be nice with a source, as well as a country and date (US at launch?) for the statement the game was marketed towards a younger demographic, the game sold for the bargain price of US$39.99. Narayanese (talk) 11:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done - found and added a source for that statement. The source used contains plenty of information if anyone is interested. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - It should be possible to clear this up through referencing an appropriate game guide or similar, or the manual's original guide. The article mentions that one was included with the game - it may be possible to locate and source. Alternatively, the review articles already referenced will probably help with some of the sections. Gazimoff (talk) 19:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Manuals can be found on sites like replacementdocs.com --Mika1h (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I added ten inline-citations, and trimmed out some stuff that couldn't be referenced. How's it look now? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maintain GA status. General practice is to cite gameplay and plot to the game itself, or to game guides. It appears that Judgesurreal777 has done a good job of doing so, and it doesn't appear as if there are other significant issues. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could somebody close this? Concerns have now been addressed, does anyone use this page anymore? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]