Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Clover (creature)/1

Clover (creature) edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: As noted, this article does have problems with sourcing and the writing style. Improvements have not been made yet, and there has been no objection to delisting.Challenger.rebecca (talk) 13:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I happen to bump in to this article fairly recently and was quite shocked to find out that this was promoted to GA status even though a number of claims in the article require citations. This shouldn't be listed for now until those citation templates (and that one that requests a clarification) are resolved. Bluesphere 06:20, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delist: The article is not substantive, the lead does not touch base on main points, the content is largely in-universe and the one external link is for the film and not Clover. DARTHBOTTO talkcont 07:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]