Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/March 2013

2011–12 Australia women's national goalball team edit

2011–12 Australia women's national goalball team

8 articles

Tyan Taylor

Contributor(s): Hawkeye7 and LauraHale

A remarkable team. All articles have passed GA --Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

why do the players deserve separate articles?
They are notable. They have abundant material about them from reliable sources. There was a lot of interest in the team in Australia because Australia had not qualified in goalball since 1996. Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
why don't the other players deserve an article?
There are no other players. All the team's players have their own articles. Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
why isn't goalball wikilinked?
Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nergaal (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support - all seems good to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support a nice "good topic". The Rambling Man (talk) 20:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic - GamerPro64 15:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1954 Atlantic hurricane season edit

1954 Atlantic hurricane season

6 articles

Contributor(s): Hurricanehink, Juliancolton, Maxim

All of the articles within the year are now GA or greater. Long-range plans of mine include getting this to featured topic (by nominating Carol and the main article), but for now GT will suffice. Probably the main point of discussion will be how to handle the two Alice's in the season. If anyone disagrees with the (1) and (2) and has a better suggestion, I'll be happy to change it. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note, Hurricane Carol is up for FAC. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I went through each individual article and don't see anything worth objecting this nomination. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 19:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice set of articles. ceranthor 00:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment happy with the moderate quality of the components, would prefer to see templates etc that are used comply with WP:ACCESS but no requirement at GA and none at GTC so no real grounds for opposition, just a note. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic - GamerPro64 22:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]