Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Natto

Natto

Reason: Unless I'm missing something, this picture is way too small. ShadowHalo 12:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: ShadowHalo

Delist — ShadowHalo 12:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist How was that promoted n the first place?--Here T oHelp 14:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Where's the original nom? Maybe that will tell us something. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐ 14:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is is. I'm guessing October 2004 was before we had resolution requirements?--HereToHelp 14:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Delist. Thanks. That's enough for me to vote. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐ 16:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the image is far too small, and for that I support de-listing the image--Hadz^Talk 16:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, for now. See the original nom again - Fir's comment at the time indicates that there might have been a larger image previously, but I can't find any history... tiZom_(2¢) 01:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Beautiful, but tiny. Enuja 05:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist How was this promoted? ^8thstar 00:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very encyclopedic, no technical flaws, really. Just because it doesn't meet our current size guideline doesn't mean it should be delisted. The FP Criteria says "Images should be at least 1000 pixels in resolution in width or height to be supported...", it doesn't say they must be 1000 pixels in either dimension. Joe D 06:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist If the image is not reproducable then the 1000pixels minimum can be ignored, but in this is no such case. We've been very strict on the 1000 pixel minimum for more important subjects, why relax the requirement for this.
Strong delist, I really like this photo, but it's something that is completely replicable so I don't think we can really justify keeping such a low resolution version (unlike with the buffaloes). gren グレン 09:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. An everyday image that should not be excused from a reasonable size requirement. Pstuart84 Talk 13:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Arad 22:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --KFP (talk | contribs) 12:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]