Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wormhole

Wormhole in Space edit

I nominated this article because I found it informing and very interesting to look at. I hope you will see it the same way.

Nominate and support. - Tarret 01:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I find it hard for someone (like me), to understand the picture thoroughly as a FP. Originaly, i though a wormhole would have been for worms, but then I read the article. I just can't really see it or not as a FP, sory paat 01:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to size. It also seems like the wormhole part of the picture isn't emphasized strongly enough -- too much of the green grid. bcasterline t 02:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, and not because I thought a wormhole was for those crawling little things but because of low resolution. Neat concept for the diagram, though it could be a little bit more clear. Phoenix2 02:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This is the classic image of a wormhole and/or black hole connecting to a white hole, but the quality is too low. If you could make it larger and less noisy, that would be better. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-03-28 04:26
Oppose, needs a version without text so it can be recaptioned for other languages. Also needs to be much higher res. —Pengo 05:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- While it would be necessary for a Commons FPC to be easily usable in all languages, this is not a necessary requirement for the English Wikipedia FPC. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-03-28 14:37
Oppose Too small, composition too cramped, not pleasing. --Janke | Talk 06:15, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nominate and Support, Great Example of a wormhole, clear, right-to-the-point, and has everything labled in my opinion! -MrPacman0 7:20 AM GMT, 31 March 2006
Support Good illustration of a wormhole. That counts. Mikeo 19:18, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this illustration. What a great concept a wormhole is! --Fir0002 www 23:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. too small psch e mp | talk 06:06, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Hmm, I liked it... --Lewk_of_S e rthic _contrib ^talk 01:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SupportL1CENSET0K1LL 19:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too flat a representation of a space with at least four dimensions. The curves look like a beginning student's drawings with simple tools, not like the real world or like good calculations of simplified ideas of it. David R. Ingham 06:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 10:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]