Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/White's tree frog

White's tree frog edit

White's tree frog

Different crop

I found out that my last photo for White's tree frog was up for Featured Picture candidacy after it had been disapproved. I didn't particularly like the image (for technical reasons, the frog is beautiful), but most of the opposition was for image size, of which I have updated since. Someone should have told me it was up. I have been trying to get an improved image for ages, and then I found this one that lives on/near my house. This was the best photo I took. Appears in White's tree frog, and taken by liquidGhoul 06:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Nominate and support. - liquidGhoul 06:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looks great! — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-01-2 06:32
Support, good use of surroundings. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, looks good and has relevance to its article. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 16:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yay!! We've had a couple of frogs turned down recently and I've been hoping a really exceptional one would come along. ~ Veledan • Talk 18:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice work. --Kilo-Lima 20:04, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice picture. Colors are especially nice. --Ironchef8000 21:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work --Fir0002 06:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks a lot better than the last one of this frog i nominated. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - Very nice photo. The frog is nicely framed, while still looking natural. JQF 21:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Edit - That's much better! Doesn't make me fell nose to nose with the frog. JQF 21:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support ooo! that is an exceptional picture. drumguy⁸⁸⁰⁰ - speak? 06:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~. Nice and clear, but it's a little too tightly cropped for my liking. enochlau (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can easily fix that. I will now. --liquidGhoul 11:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done --liquidGhoul 12:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support new version. enochlau (talk) 12:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support the edit. Renata3 05:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support the new version, yup Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 23:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edited better DaGizza^Chat ^(c) 04:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support second, much better! --Dschwen 07:29, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support either version Eyesclosed 20:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support second Julien 00:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Australia green tree frog (Litoria caerulea) crop.jpg Raven4x4x 04:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]