Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Water drops on spider web

Stunning image of water drops on spider web, found in several articles like adhesion, dew, water

Nominate and support. - vineeth 05:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Image is blurry, background is less than spectacular, and overall the image just isn't that great. --Hetar 05:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, seriously lacking in sharpness. --Dschwen 06:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred - Adrian Pingstone 07:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Wonderful subject, but the picture is blurred ~~and it doesn't meet size requirements (at least 1000x1000)~~. --Tewy 02:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per Arpingstone --GoOdCoNtEnT 02:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. -- Moondigger 05:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject is cut off, blur, limited background. Good idea for an FP though, it just lacks technical excellence. HighInBC 12:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support EXCELLENT PHOTO should be used for this: Interplanetary Superhighway Žena Dhark…·°º•ø®@» 07:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very much illustrates the concept of water adhesion, although the picture of droplets on grass leaves serves the purpose much better IMO. Jeeb 02:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a nice picture, but it is blurry, unencyclopedic and could be sharper. Also, Zena, you say this could be on Interplanetary Superhighway: How so? This does not depict an interplanetary superhighway. This depicts drops of water on a spider web. Sorry. Viva La V i e Boheme!

Oh, I'm sorry. The 'artistic' redering of the Interplanetary Superhighway is a much more accurate depiction. Because everyone knows the Interplanetary Superhighway has curves and stuff. Zena Dhark…·°º•ø®@» 11:12, 23 August 2006 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

Not promoted -- Moondigger 02:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]