Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Turbulence

Turbulence edit

Turbulent waterflow

I think it is a fascinating illustration to the turbulence article.

Nominate and support. - Circeus 02:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, looks good, but it is difficult to understand exactly what it is. If you look in the article, the submarine picture provides a clearer definition for turbulence. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 16:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Reflection on water is disturbing. It took me some time to see what this picture represented Glaurung 07:08, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - The reflection is mainly the off-putting thing, and as with Glaurung, above, it also took me sometime to actually understand what it was. --Kilo-Lima 20:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I still cannot figure out exactly what it is, or from what angle the picture was taken. The top is alright, but the bottom is blurry and rather unpleasant looking. --Ironchef8000 21:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
( − ) Oppose Agree with Ironchef8000 --Fir0002 06:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It looks pretty, but like the others, I can't make heads or tails of it. enochlau (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for the same reasons as above. I think the image would be a lot clearer if the photographer had been a bit farther back from the subject. As is, it looks like an abstract photograph. --jackohare 18:13, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I like it but the general consensus seems to be against it. Oh well. sikander 08:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral If none of us can figure it out, how does it help the article..? Perhaps there should be a more explanatory caption.
Oppose Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Featured picture has to be distinguishable in context as well as out of context. Tony (Talk),

Vandalism Ninja 03:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Support Precisely by the same reasons why you oppose: it is disturbing, it is complex to understand; because it is turbulence.189.250.12.115 (talk) 16:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]