Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/TrickeyPondSunrise

Trickey Pond Sunrise

My own image. Trickey Pond is a beautiful pond, sought out for its beauty by photographers around the state. I believe it clearly illustrates the pond, as well as being quite eye-catching.

Nominate and support. - Tony (Talk), Vandalism Ninja 03:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Is that white stuff on the lake fog or artifacts? enochlau (talk) 06:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The white stuff is fog --Tony (Talk), Vandalism Ninja 14:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The trees are too dark (it needs to be encyclopaedic), and I don't like the fog. Compare with the sunset featured pictures, and this isn't as high quality. --liquidGhoul 10:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, sorry, but this could be (almost) any lake. --Dschwen 12:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, I like the fog and the trees, but the sky and the water contain artefacts. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - As a thumbnail it's an OK picture, but full size quality is a letdown. Alr 17:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - A very typical sunset pic, just like zillions of other sunset pics. Not original enough to be featured IMHO. Eyesclosed 19:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User's 5th edit.
And yet to the point User:Brian0918. --Dschwen 10:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, as above. enochlau (talk) 15:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User:Kilo-Lima/Support I like it. ^KILO-_LIMA 20:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it looks good. But in full resolution I see bad quality. Andrew₁₈ ^@ 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sadly... it's a lovely shot, but the noise and artifacts at full mag make it problematic. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 17:58, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Not promoted Broken Segue 02:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]