Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Spot fetcher

Burnt highlights, low res, poor focus/sharpness

Support Delisting --Fir0002 www 08:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist As above --liquidGhoul 08:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delist. Fir is right of course but I also have sympathy with the reasons it was promoted. Alas, probably not enough to keep it as an FP ~ Veledan • Talk 17:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. As above. More to the point I support delisting the whole Spot Fetcher article. What's the point of it - can I make an article about my pet? Cute dog though. --jjron 10:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above, though it is a nice shot. -- bcasterline • talk 12:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Is this what the standards used to be? My God. Delist per above. --Life is like a box of chocolates 22:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. It is interesting to see the comments that Veledan linked to above. It just shows how much pickier FP is now. Witt y lama 16:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Very cute, however it is too small, and too blurry. --Pharaoh Hound 13:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't think the shortcomings are sufficiently severe. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delist size and everything else above.say1988 23:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image delisted ~ Veledan • Talk 23:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]