Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Spiral100

Spiral Notebook edit

Spiral notebook

I took this picture of a spiral notebook. The spiral is really cool. It is on the "Spiral" page.

Nominate and support. - Rkstiner 00:22, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think it would look a lot better if the part that was closest to us was in focus. I'd also like a greater depth of field. --vaeiou 00:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a neat picture, but it illustrates the spiral rather poorly. It is also far too small for FP status. ~MDD 46 96 02:24, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - too small. Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It doesn't really illustrate a spiral at all since you can't see the entire structure. Nice photography but not encyclopaedic. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 05:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, artsy fartsy, not encyclopedic, and too small. --Dschwen 07:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Unremarkable, non-illustrative.--Deglr6328 07:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Technically speaking, this is a helix, not a spiral. But regardless of what article it belongs in, the photo is too small and doesn't illustrate the concept very well. Camerafiend 00:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
( − ) Oppose Too small, but I'd probably support a higher res version --Fir0002 23:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose does not show the structure of a spiral.. nor does it show the function of it. Not sure how you would manage showing the function of the spiral in a picture.. but eh. drumguy⁸⁸⁰⁰ - speak? 06:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Attractive, but doesn't quite do its job on an encyclopedia. enochlau (talk) 11:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too small and while I do like it, I don't see it as serving much of a purpose on an encyclopedia... unless it somehow represents a style of photography. gren グレン 02:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - almost unencyclopedic. Doesn't show the entire notebook, or even the entire 'spiral' part. Great quality photo, but not at all belonging as a Featured Picture. Tony (Talk), Vandalism Ninja 03:20, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd support if it was higher res. Eyesclosed 20:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 08:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]