Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sidi Saiyyad Ni Jaali

Sidi Saiyyad Ni Jaali

Taken from peer review,Wikipedia:Picture_peer_review/Sidi_Saiyyad_Ni_Jaali.

Taken from that page: I (L1CENSET0K1LL ) took this photograph on December 2005 of the Sidi Saiyaad Ni Jaali at Sidi Saiyaad masjid in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. It appears in the English Wikipedia for Ahmedabad as well as the Gujarati Wikipedia for Sidi Saiyyad Ni Jaali and Ahmedabad. I would like to eventually nominate it for featured image of the day and seek your input before doing so.

Nominate and support. - Ravedave 03:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, amazing detail! —Keenan Pepper 04:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not much to say here.Nnfolz 08:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice detail etc, but to me it's just a fancy wall - not FP worthy IMO--Fir0002 09:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A clear FP. Witt y lama 10:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing pic but it is not sharp enough quality, if you compare it to one of Fir0002's FP then you will see its blurry in comparrison. Childzy ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 10:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful picture, and I think the very large version is fine on focus - Adrian Pingstone 10:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment OK doesnt = FP, focusing needs to be perfect. Childzy ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 09:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Slightly out of focus. Purple/blue fringing upper right. Distracting object behind designwork at lower left. -- moondigger 13:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Reasons above. Cab02 15:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I reaaaally like it. Renata 03:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As above. --Abdominator 01:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in the end, it's a pretty average photo of a nice carving. Being able to see some background in the lower part of the image is distracting. The lighting isn't great - too harsh. I'm sure someone could take a much nicer photo of this same artwork, maybe in the evening, from a slightly different angle, and get a nicer result. So I'm opposing as I would a bad quality scan of a great painting. Stevage 08:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. An unimpressive photo of a really cool subject. --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 17:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support we need more encyclopedic photos and less pretty pictures -- Samir धर्म 03:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
oppose --Vircabutar 17:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - chopped off top pattern is annoying.--Deglr6328 01:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 11:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]