Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/San Francisco Earthquake of 1906, Ruins in vicinity of Post and Grant Avenue

San Francisco Earthquake of 1906, Ruins in vicinity of Post and Grant Avenue

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2019 at 18:30:09 (UTC)

Original – San Francisco Earthquake of 1906: Ruins in vicinity of Post and Grant Avenue. Looking northeast.

Reason: historical image of great encyclopedic value
Articles in which this image appears: 1906 San Francisco earthquake, Portal:Disasters, Disaster, Ruins, Lloyd's of London, San Francisco graft trials, and several others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: H. D. Chadwick, restored by Yann

Support as nominator The quality is not extraordinary, but this is largely compensated by the historical value. – Yann (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There's a couple of areas that could do with a little more cleanup - a streak on the RHS at about y=700 and that stuff in the top left appears to be a smudge and not smoke. By the way, may I interest you in File:San Francisco Fire Sacramento Street 1906-04-18.jpg? MER-C 20:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: Done. I see there is a history here... One thing at a time... Yann (talk) 23:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not entirely happy with the sky. It looks kind of overblown, in a very dirty way. Though it doesnt' look as bad from some angles on my LCD screen Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 23:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: What do you suggest? As I said above, the quality is a bit below other candidates, but I think this is compensated by the historical value. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dodge/burn tool? Might also want to crop some sky: The buidings aren't bad at all. I think cropping a little above the two smoke plumes would get rid of a lot of ugly damaged sky with a net improvement to composition. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 23:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with a crop. Should I overload the image? What do others think? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Up to you. Feel free to remove my mockup when it's no longer helpful. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 11:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Almost perfect now. I've added a couple image notes on a last couple things, but I'm sure you'll get them. Support Seriously, skies are the worst. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 13:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 13:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted one more thing I noted while reviewing. I'm sorry for all the trouble. I think my monitor has fairly good detail in the upper range. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 14:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. Yann (talk) 16:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Good historical EV. Sca (talk) 15:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 20:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support – we have other FPs in the article, but the nom image is a good depiction of the damage. Bammesk (talk) 03:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support - DannyS712 (talk) 06:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Post-and-Grant-Avenue-Look.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]