Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rough diamonds in UV and normal light

Rough diamonds in UV and normal light

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 12:10:38 (UTC)

Original – Composite image of photos showing a necklace of rough diamonds in both UV and natural light

Reason: FP on Commons, created for Wiki Science Competition 2023 to show the difference between an object in two light sources in a more interesting way than the usual side-by-side images. Stable in articles with ok view stats.
Articles in which this image appears: Diamond, Fluorescence
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
Creator: W.carter

Support as nominator – cart-Talk 12:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I kind of get the artistic viewpoint, but the composite just doesn't add any encyclopedic value and could be potentially misleading, especially with the artificial effect, which is not explained by the actual caption in the article. The normal montage File:Rough diamonds - necklace in UV and normal light B.jpg, while maybe not as "interesting", does a much better job of illustrating the phenomenon in a readily apparent manner. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Surely File:Rough diamonds - necklace in UV and normal light A.jpg? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has a better composition, but it's not as sharp or detailed at full size. There is more EV in the sharper versions [1][2] I think. Bammesk (talk) 23:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly why I chose this composition for the nom. The blurry part of the necklace doesn't add that much to the image. Cart (talk) 23:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional Support On "composite" or words to that effect being added to the descriptions in the articles. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 07:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I updated the article image captions per Paul. I am Ok with the composite image, it's easy enough to look at and interesting IMO. Bammesk (talk) 00:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 08:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]