Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Prinsengracht by night

Prinsengracht by night edit

Original - The Prinsengracht in Amsterdam by night

Reason: This high resolution photograph shows the Prinsengracht, a 17th century canal in Amsterdam. It presents a characteristic view of the Amsterdam canals by night.
Articles this image appears in: Amsterdam, Canals of Amsterdam
Creator: commons:User:Aforaseem

Support as nominator Ilse @ 11:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I have no real reason to oppose, as it is a very nice image, but it doesn't pop out at me as being FP quality. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 15:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. de Bivort 15:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beautiful scene, though not as sharp as it could be. CillaИ ♦ XC 16:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'll bite. Warm and inviting. Durova^Charge! 18:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - Beautiful composition but not special enough for FP. Also, I don't like the (unnecessary) small size and the visible noise. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noise. ^8thstar 21:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose a day picture would probably capture more detail. H92110 (talk) 03:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I am the creator of this photo. I have other versions which are sharper and full size. I don't know how will this photo be treated if I replace this photo now with a better version. Please suggest, thx. aforaseem —Preceding comment was added at 17:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe you can (separately) upload one (or more) alternative(s), so people can choose among them. Compare: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates#Mont Blanc. – Ilse @ 07:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak-ish Support I actually quite like this picture. It's an attractive shot which made me interested in reading about the subject. On the other hand, it does seem that a more spectacular photo could be taken, and I'd be interested to see what else aforaseem has for us. faithless (^speak) 01:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per 8thstar.D-rew (talk) 02:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 09:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]