Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kaleva Church

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 09:28:58 (UTC)

 
Original – The modern Kaleva Church, designed by Reima and Raili Pietilä, is situated in Liisankallio, Tampere.
Reason
high EV, good quality, architecturally interesting
Articles in which this image appears
Kaleva Church, Kaleva (Tampere), Reima and Raili Pietilä, Tampere
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
kallerna
We really need an interior photo in the article... --Janke | Talk 14:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Janke: There are a few in the commons folder, although they don't (can't, really) quite convey the sense of space. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support under the assumption the article will at least be a bit bigger before it's considered for main page. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 09:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question I don't think we should make this sort of assumption. BUT, I've read through the FP criteria and I cannot find any guideline that excludes stub articles. I have assumed, because my images in stub articles have been rejected, that article size is a criteria. Opinions anyone? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "because my images in stub articles have been rejected", could you give us some examples please (where article size was the reason for rejection), so that we are all on the same page? Bammesk (talk) 15:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • My understanding is that it's not a requirement, but if notability isn't established, that can sink a nom, obviously. More relevant to Charles' question is that a failure to have a reasonably long article will block POTD, and some people will vote accordingly. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 18:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here is my take, I go by one or two paragraphs, not one or two sentences. For a notable subject, it shouldn't be much effort to have one or two paragraphs. Criterion 5 says "Adds significant encyclopedic value to an article and helps readers to understand an article". If an article, for all practical purposes, is not written, then the image can't add significant EV to what is not-there-to-be-understood. Bammesk (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding "How can readers understand the 1/2 line article [1] without this picture?": There isn't anything to understand, because the article isn't written. The 1/2 line is a placeholder, it isn't an article. Bammesk (talk) 20:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - good picture of a notable building. Also I am delighted to discover that the architect's older sister was the partner of the author who created the Moomins. TSP (talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Kaleva Church 4.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 14:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]