Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rose Geranium.jpg

Pelargonium graveolens edit

Reason: High resolution photograph of Pelargonium graveolens(Rose Geranium).
Articles this image appears in: Pelargonium graveolens
Creator: Laitche

Support as nominator -- Laitche (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp focus, nice composure, no noise. Also depicts its subject well. Sam Barsoom 20:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sharp. Shooting it from the side may have been more enc than head-on, because the lengths of the structures are more clearly visible.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 22:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent macro, and pleasing composition. Can't fault it. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful macro, crisp subject, vivid colours, pleasing composition and smooth diffused background. Capital photographer (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ooooo, look at that bokeh! Creamy. Great shot. -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 04:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject takes up too small a portion of the picture. It would be far better if the picture was centered. EgraS (talk) 06:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I gather you mainly take snapshots then Capital photographer (talk) 03:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you make assumptions about one persons photography (or if they even partake in photography) based on their preference for a center composition for encyclopedia illustrations? I also prefer that encyclopedia illustrations have non-artistic compositions with limited negative space, does that make me a bad photographer? Cacophony (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Capital photographer. crassic!^[talk] 02:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Beautiful, encyclopedic, and high quality. NauticaShad es 01:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice picture. I like the vivid colour. Spencer^T♦^C 18:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Rose Geranium.jpg MER-C 12:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]