Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hyacinth Macaw

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2012 at 14:20:17 (UTC)

Original – Hyacinth Macaw,

Alt 1

Support as nominator --Brandmeister^talk 14:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Quite nice Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No tail in the frame compromises EV, noisy, underexposed. Captive shot doesn't leave much excuse. JJ Harrison (talk) 00:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support original, support alt 1 The alt is clearer and shows the tail. Pine^(talk) 07:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - Alt 1, at 683x1024, just barely clears the FP resolution limit; the subject itself is only about 900px tall. For a 'skinny' subject like this – particularly one in captivity – we really need more resolution. There's also significant difference in color between the two images; is this representative of normal variation between specimens? TenOfAllTrades(talk) 22:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I too think the Alt 1 from Flickr (and from different contributor?) has not enough quality. Jkadavoor (talk) 04:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 19:17, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]