Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Green market

Bead edit

Alternative image

Reason: The picture displays the vibrant colors of nature's beauty arranged in such exotic patterns in an urban environment.
Articles this image appears in: Bead
Creator: Giorgia Poli

Support as nominator Λua∫Wi se ^(talk) 12:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Óppose - No evidence this actually shows a "green market", which is different than "The Green market" (ecologically sensitive markets) and may be a Greenmarket (Farmer's market). The Green market article is a mess, a mish mash of the environment and the Grey market that has no citations or evidence to back it up. Additionally, this photo just looks like a nicely arranged bead shop. Next, the pic is residing in Green Marketing - where it is even further away from illustrating the subject, as green marketing refers to the marketing of eco products. Colorful - yes. I'm not particularly stunned by the composition though, and the fact that it doesn't say on the original source what it is, and that it doesn't really show anything related to these concepts makes me highly skeptical of its illustrative value to the encyclopedia. pschemp | talk 16:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this would go in Bead somewhere? pschemp | talk 19:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that is a good idea... I will see what I can do.This way , we will have addressed your concern, and it will have a greater encyclopidic value. Please future voters, consider this picture to be on bead, while I move it there tomorrow.Thanks.Λua∫Wi se ^(talk) 21:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Been five days, and now this picture isn't used in any articles...it's nice, but enc. value questionable. I put at the top of the bead article, considering its general view of the subject, which contrasts with the closeup already there. vlad§inger ^tlk 03:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I totally forgot about moving it... thanks!! Λua∫Wi se ^(talk) 13:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose To my mind, fails notability test. Clegs (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability doesn't apply to FP discussions. MER-C 07:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 02:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]