Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ghyas el Din Jami - Tabriz (?) - Google Art Project.jpg

Persian carpet made by artist Ghyas el Din Jami Wool, cotton and silk, from 1542 - 1543 edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2015 at 12:32:09 (UTC)

Original – Persian carpet made by artist Ghyas el Din Jami – Wool, cotton and silk, from 1542–1543

Reason: why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first)
Articles in which this image appears: Persian carpet
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others
Creator: Ghyas el Din Jami

Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 12:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - Hafspajen (talk) 12:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~-Oppose per comments below. ~~Very good image of~~ an excellent example of a Persian carpet. CorinneSD (talk) 17:54, 25 February 2015 (UTC)CorinneSD (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But I have a question: why is it dark at the corners, especially at the left end? Is that a result of aging of the carpet or of lighting? - CorinneSD (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Oppose looks very blurry at full resolution. Can't make out details. Renata (talk) 18:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The image has been tampered with. A digital patch was applied (badly) on top of a (damaged?) portion of the carpet on the upper right corner. Also, although the pixel count is not bad, the image is indeed quite blurry. And, BTW, are we sure that we got the size right? 0.3x0.7 meters is more like a doormat than a carpet. --Ebertakis (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- The file is a Google file, https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/tabriz/CgFkUW6YyFkczw source say 682 cm X 322 cm, that's giant. It's added - |pretty_dimensions = w682 x h335 cm, no idea why it is comming up as milimeter. Hafspajen (talk) 23:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ebertakis. Really bad digital manipulation in the top right in terms of resolutions, brightness, and alignment mismatch. -- KTC (talk) 23:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well, pity for the technicalities, because it is a gorgeous carpet. Hafspajen (talk) 01:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I hope Google didn't pay too much for that photograph. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]