Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eastern dwarf tree frog
Good example of the colour variations available in this species of frog, with both the common colours in one frog. Appears in Eastern dwarf tree frog, created and nominated by liquidGhoul
- Nominate and support. - liquidGhoul 11:58, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Vibrant color.--Dakota t e 01:55, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Oppose.The legs especially are a little too out of focus for my liking. Enochlau 03:01, 15 November 2005 (UTC)- Comment Woops, I had a choice of two photos, and accidentally uploaded the wrong one. The more in focus photo is below. --liquidGhoul 05:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Change to neutral. I'm perhaps being a bit too pedantic, but the head is out of focus now. Enochlau 10:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- How's this liquidGhoul 07:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- I don't quite know - is it just me or are the markings on the skin near the head still not very clear? Enochlau 23:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like very slight motion blur to me, actually. No part of the image is particularly sharp which is a shame as the image is otherwise pretty good. Diliff 20:27, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- I don't quite know - is it just me or are the markings on the skin near the head still not very clear? Enochlau 23:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- How's this liquidGhoul 07:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Change to neutral. I'm perhaps being a bit too pedantic, but the head is out of focus now. Enochlau 10:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Woops, I had a choice of two photos, and accidentally uploaded the wrong one. The more in focus photo is below. --liquidGhoul 05:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- User:Vanderdecken/Support 3rd pic. Nicely done, needed the sharpening. —Vanderdecken∫ξφ 19:14, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Just not quite sharp/large enough. Some motion blurring (I think). What was the shutter speed? The EXIF data is hard to interpret sometimes. Diliff 20:27, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Not promoted Raven4x4x 06:07, 27 November 2005 (UTC)