Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cuban boys

Cuban boys edit

Cuban boys playing in Trinidad, Cuba. I feel this image documents the life and joy of young cubans.

 
Cuban Boys playing
  • Nominate and support. - Jplavoie 15:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Picture is not in an article. -Ravedave 16:10, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where's all the water coming from?--Deglr6328 17:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • From their water bottles, they were splashing themselves. - Jplavoie 21:33, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Neutral Nice pic, but the cut off legs are a problem --Fir0002 www 12:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Good shot. Almost a great shot, the kind I'd expect to see in a coffee table book on Cuba... but the legs are cut off and the balance of the photo suffers as a result, IMO. Either way, I don't see this as being valuable to any article, hence the oppose. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose per above. J.Steinbock (Talk)
  • Oppose. Agree that it is a very niec Coffeeshop style image, suitable for documentary photography but not very encylopaedic. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 10:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support This is very well executed. Encyclopedic worth is that its indicitive of a culture.. and there's nothing wrong with the feet being cut off, that's just FPC-criterion-elitism. drumguy8800 - speak 02:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Bad framing. Also, there's nothing that indicates this is specific to Trinidad, Cuba - could be anywhere in the Caribbean, or even Latin America. --Janke | Talk 06:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose agree with Dante.--Dschwen 07:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a good picture, but there is some "noise" or something on the lens that is holding it back --T-rex 02:13, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not that great of a picture. Just a couple of boys playing in what could be any Latin American country -- BWF89 01:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted ~ VeledanTalk 21:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]