Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/CreoleFood

Creole Food edit

Creole food

Edit

Edit #2

Here's a nice find: A professionally shot photo of food that's free use. This image shows dishes typical of Louisiana Creole cuisine. The composition is nice, it's sharp, and I don't see any significant JPEG compression artifacts. Also used in Louisiana, Cuisine of the United States, and Cuisine of the Southern United States.

Nominate and ~~support~~. howch e ng {chat} 19:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Very nice, Janke. Good work. Support edit #2. howch e ng {chat} 15:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I like the composition and it seems quite professional. HOWEVER, there is some significant overexposure to the point where the dish that is second from the right on the top row is rather indistinguishable. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 21:18, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support The slight overexposure doesn't bother me enough to oppose - sure, the highlights in the white plates are blown, but I can still distinguish all the food. Yummy! --Janke | Talk 22:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The edit is better - but still, the second right dish is blown - it could be selectively darkened. If no-one else does, I'll do it after Easter. --Janke | Talk 07:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am torn on this one. The colors are really washed out & dull. It reminds me of a 1980s cookbook. Can it be fixed? -Ravedave 22:24, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I uploaded an edit. Turned up the overall saturation, dropped the brightness on the white, and upped the contrast in the noodle dish that Diliff refers to. howch e ng {chat} 06:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support That edit is great! Looks really yummy! -Ravedave 19:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it possible to give names to the dishes are? —Pengo 01:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The only I can personally identify is jambalaya, right-most one in the bottom row. howch e ng {chat} 06:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditionally support edit#2~~ if the caption is expanded an all the dishes are identified. The edit#1 looks more appetizing but I think it is overdone a little bit. I have a tomato and a bottle of Tabasco right here, and neither of them are this red. --Dschwen 07:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The caption still needs some loving, it would cetrainly increase encyclopedic value if it was stated what we are looking at! --Dschwen 10:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose. The polls are closing and nothing happened. I'll go with oppose now. Overexposure bothers me too now. FP sould be perfect. --Dschwen 13:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pic seems overexposed in both versions - Adrian Pingstone 10:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. The edit is an improvement, but there are still problems with exposure. Oppose —Cuivi é nen, Thursday, 13 April 2006 @ 03:32 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Cuivi é nen --Fir0002 www 11:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --Xtreambar 16:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: As promised, here's a slightly darker upload with the plates selectively darkened a bit more, but no saturation increase. My support is thus for edit #2. --Janke | Talk 09:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, preference is for edit #1. Excellent illustration and well composed. Encyclopedic value for showing a wide range of creole dishes. -Fadookie ^Talk 12:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted ~MDD 46 96 22:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]