Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/British Airways Boeing 767-300ER planform view

British Airways Boeing 767-300ER planform view edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 10:31:28 (UTC)

Original – Planform view of a British Airways 767-300ER with deployed flaps after takeoff

Reason: High quality and EV: shows retracted undercarriages and deployed flaps after takeoff. This image is derived from a featured picture on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Boeing 767
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air
Creator: Created by Arpingstone, modified by Altair78

Support as nominator – sst✈^(discuss) 10:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Only JUST above minimum size (seems to have lost size compared to the original), and consequently difficult to get very close in and see detail - especially around the nose. Seems to be small haloing around the lower wing and tail. Also just curious but any reason it has been flipped from the original? gazhiley 12:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- WikiProject Aviation (and its sub-projects) prefer aircraft images with the nose pointing to the left side, facing the article text. sst✈^(discuss) 13:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Haha awesome! That's mad... Thanks for explaining... gazhiley 12:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Oppose – Belly-view is of minimal interest or EV except to aviation enthusiasts. Sca (talk) 14:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Resolution, clarity and detail is fairly limited compared with other FP of aircraft. Also the angle, while interesting in itself, limits general EV in my opinion. Wolftick (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per Sca and Wolftick, also a bit tight at the wingtips.--Godot13 (talk) 01:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Are all these meant to be Opposes? I don't understand these as "Comments" as the latter two are not really making much of a comment other than "per ....." gazhiley 11:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least as neutral, if that's clearer. --Tremonist (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I comment as per "All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count." Wolftick (talk) 02:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support – Jobas (talk) 01:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]