Oppose Is it just the lighting, or do I spy compression artefacts in the feathers? Also, the shadow spoils it. Separa (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Lighting makes the bird look very flat (too much flash). I can see the issue raised by Separa (looks a bit like artifacts) - Peripitus(Talk) 13:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad lighting, obvious shadow, and unencyclopedic pose. Clegs (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
StrongOppose - low quality, colour noise, bad lighting, rubbish background. Please read the Featured picture criteria. If you are going to take a photo of any subject, let alone an animal, do not do it in front of a door in your house. If this is unavoidable, by all means take the photo, but don't nominate it for FP as it will never pass. Nominator has 7 mainspace edits, and creator has a history of copyright an fair use policy violations. Note that was just an FYI, it is not intended to and should not influence the nomination. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Per all the above. Cat-five - talk 08:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - low quality, colour noise, bad lighting, rubbish background. Please read the Featured picture criteria. If you are going to take a photo of any subject, let alone an animal, do not do it in front of a door in your house. If this is unavoidable, by all means take the photo, but don't nominate it for FP as it will never pass. Nominator has 7 mainspace edits, and creator has a history of copyright an fair use policy violations. Note that was just an FYI, it is not intended to and should not influence the nomination. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Strong Oppose Per all the above. Cat-five - talk 08:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
