Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bentley S1 Continental Fastback Coupe Mulliner

Bentley S1 Continental Fastback Coupe Mulliner edit

 
Bentley S1 Continental Fastback Coupe Mulliner
 

Self-nom. It illustrate the Bentley and Bentley S1. I like it and think its of good quality. - Ericd 15:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral: the shadows on the car are distracting. Any way that con be corrected? TomStar81 00:46, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • No hope IMHO. I don't think a B & W photography of a black car could render the volume without some shadows and reflections. Ericd 01:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Sorry, but as a FPC those shadows kill it. It is a good pic of the car, just a shame it wasn't in constant lighting. --jjron 09:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • OpposeSupport Tilted, needs a tiny bit of anticlockwise rotation then I'll support it - Adrian Pingstone 14:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Adrian, I think it's not tilted. Its more a resizing issue on the white pillar IMO (See detail). Ericd 16:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • OK, accepted. I change my vote to Support - Adrian Pingstone 17:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • Thanks, I will try why different resizing algorithms. Ericd 19:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question What on earth is that picture of the building window doing below the voting picture? Viva La Vie Boheme 02:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's here to check if the picture is tilted. Ericd 08:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Clarification: Ericd added this enlargement of the above image (just above the car's windshield). The black lines are perfectly vertical, and it shows that the window is also vertical. Hope that makes sense. Stevage 08:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, Oppose It is just too shadowy. If it were a sunny day that day, you would have immediate support from me... Viva La Vie Boheme
    • Well, it was a sunny afternoon. When there's no sun there's no shadow. Ericd 17:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]