Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of state and union territory capitals in India/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 22:25:11 28 April 2019 (UTC) [1].
List of state and union territory capitals in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list removal candidates/List of state and union territory capitals in India/archive1
- Featured list removal candidates/List of state and union territory capitals in India/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: Vensatry, Crzycheetah, Dwaipayanc, WikiProject India
A lot has changed since the FL check in 2012. Entire key table has been removed which was better formatted. Nagpur is entirely missing from the article. Until recently Naya Raipur was being listed as the capital of Chhattisgarh (till I fixed it to Raipur). The notes have all been altered completely. Also, significant developments have happened since then: creation of the new state Telangana; new capitals Naya Raipur, Amravati, Dharamshala.
Keeping all of this in view, the list definitely needs a review on its FL status. Gotitbro (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist This list is a mess. The lead has only two references and is to short. How Gotitbro already said, the list is outdated.—21:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delist In it's present state, it is a mess. There is a note from the table in the lead for some reason? The dates are a bit strange, because for example, it lists the former capital of Assam to be before the state of Assam was created. If it's a capital of a country before India, then wouldn't it be consistent to do this to other states? Very messy. Mattximus (talk) 23:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delist the lead is very weak but the rest of the article appears to be just about satisfactory. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:51, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist – Lead is too short and it has almost no references to back anything up. – BeatlesLedTV (talk) 21:43, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.