Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Jacksonville Jaguars first-round draft picks/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Jacksonville Jaguars first-round draft picks edit
List of Jacksonville Jaguars first-round draft picks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Nishkid64, Crzycheetah, Debartolo2917 WP Lists, WP NFL
Almost entirely unsourced, which is even more concerning given that this is largely a BLP list. A 2007 promotion that does not meet current standards. Hog Farm Talk 20:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I concur. It seems a lot of these NFL first-round draft pick lists that are featured could be candidates for removal (see List of Carolina Panthers first-round draft picks, which has similar sourcing issues). I have recently done work on the Chicago Bears version, and it may be more up-to-speed. Debartolo2917 (talk) 06:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with the nominator's rationale. It's been a couple of weeks since the nomination and no-one has improved the article yet. Removal seems fair. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove – The sourcing is insufficient for a modern FL. The individual entries could stand to be cited individually (as I've done with the Giants list I worked on), a couple of the general references are shaky in terms of reliability, and the lead is entirely lacking sources. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per Giants 2008. Hog Farm Talk 21:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove – Not up to current criteria of any review process, much less FLC. The edit history shows very few edits of any kind, and the nominator seems to have been only semi-active for years. Amazing how little it took to pass an FLC in 2007.— Maile (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist – Article is not sufficiently sourced to be exemplary. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 11:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @WP:FLC director and delegates: - Given the fairly strong consensus here, the fact that it's been three months, and the fact that the BLP list is still largely unsourced, is it time to remove/delist? Hog Farm Talk 00:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hog Farm: Given that I declared my position already, we're going to need another, uninvolved, closer to handle this one. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delisting. --PresN 18:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.