Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/FC Barcelona in Europe/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Dabomb87 18:06, 26 July 2011 [1].
FC Barcelona in Europe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/FC Barcelona in Europe/archive1
- Featured list candidates/FC Barcelona in Europe/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Sandman888, Football WikiProject
I am nominating this for featured list removal because after the promotion of Liverpool F.C. in Europe to Good Article status I believe this would be better suited to an article rather than a list. Barcelona are a club with great European tradition, at present the list simply lists the results the club had in Europe. Following on from the Liverpool article I feel this is the logical step for this article. NapHit (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove - This article would be far better served with more text, making it more eligible for FA status than FL. Therefore, I believe it is ineligible for the FL criteria and its FL status should be removed. – PeeJay 19:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove – As said above, it would be better with more prose content to make a GA or FA. — Bill william comptonTalk 00:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove – I also believe this list should be removed. Most information here can be found in other articles already. --MicroX (talk) 10:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a discussion about removing FL status, not removing the article altogether! – PeeJay 01:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- As PeeJay says, this isn't an AfD discussion. We are only determining whether the list deserves to be featured (the removes only refer to the FL star). Any movement for deletion should begin elsewhere, though with the existence of similar articles for Liverpool and other clubs, I can't see such an effort getting very far. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a discussion about removing FL status, not removing the article altogether! – PeeJay 01:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove. I wasn't previously convinced that there was a real need for such lists, and was therefore going to stay away on the grounds that my opinion is already well known. However, the Liverpool article has convinced me that in an article format they are worthwhile. —WFC— 14:45, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.