Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Yugoslav order of battle for the invasion of Yugoslavia/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 10:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Yugoslav order of battle for the invasion of Yugoslavia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Peacemaker67 (send... over) 13:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it has recently successfully been through the MILHIST A-Class List review process, and I believe it meets the FL criteria. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 13:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick Comment It may seem obvious but I think you should include somewhere in the lead that these actions took place during the second world war. Mattximus (talk) 02:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 13:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Oppose the lead is too short, the tables don't meet access requirements, there appears to be an excess of red links (or no links) to most of the items included. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Opening comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support - This looks like a great list to me (and what had to be a difficult topic to assemble, I'm sure). References all look good, images are all suitably licensed, so no issues there, no dablinks, no problems with ELs, etc. Parsecboy (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be the featured list criteria you're judging it against really. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I know. I just mentioned some of the specific things I checked. Parsecboy (talk) 20:10, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be the featured list criteria you're judging it against really. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — I have one question, does the color coding in the various tables require an additional qualifier to help distinguish between mobilized, in part and commenced? MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No, the text "commenced", "in part" and "mobilised" does that. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Opposesorting not working, check "Royal Yugoslav Navy" table, "Displacement" col for instance. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Displacment sort fixed MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:24, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comment: Is the submarine "Nebojsca" supposed to be Yugoslav submarine Nebojsa? 23 editor (talk) 00:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You should probably use authorlinks for the references (i.e. Tomasevich). 23 editor (talk) 00:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Both done, thanks 23! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 03:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.