Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Vladimir Horowitz discography/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 01:11, 22 April 2010 [1].

Vladimir Horowitz discography

Nominator(s): Etincelles ^(talk) 18:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC) and Pianoplonkers (talk • contribs) 10:33, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because in the last nomination all problems were fixed and since I have added many more references. Etincelles ^(talk) 18:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Jujutacular ^T · C 16:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

"Video releases" section - Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto No. 3 is out of order
Divide reflist into columns for readability
File:HorowitzPianoBain.jpg could use a touch up (a few scratches) - if you don't mind I could do it.

Note:Restored version uploaded at File:HorowitzPianoBain2.jpg. Jujutacular ^T · C 20:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jujutacular ^T · C 17:51, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Etincelles ^(talk) 13:56, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support As far as I can tell, all issues with the previous nomination have been resolved. I couldn't find anything else to take issue with. Good work. Jujutacular ^T · C 16:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk)

Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)

Under the dates column of "Albums", why are some of the years separated by a slash?
- This is done when albums were recorded in two specific years, not recorded in a variety of years where a dash has being used.Etincelles ^(talk) 13:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'd recommend using commas instead, as they are less ambiguous. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done. Etincelles ^(talk) 08:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What makes Encyclopedia.com a reliable source?
- Removed. Etincelles ^(talk) 13:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - So what references the info that was previously cited to that site? Dabomb87 (talk) 03:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Now referenced. Etincelles ^(talk) 08:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Publications (The New York Times and Rolling Stone) should be italicized. You can do this in the reference by changing "publisher" to "work" in the citation templates. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done.Etincelles ^(talk) 13:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is an excellent piece of work and has improved immeasurably since its first nomination. I was heavily involved in the first review, I have to say that this is a massive improvement over that list, and will take some time to check it over, but right now it's an example of how to take constructive criticism and develop a great list out of it. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support worthy of FL status. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments –

"Horowitz's final recording, with Sony Classical was completed four days before his death". Feels like it could use another comma after Sony Classical.
"This final recording consisted of repertoire that he had never previously recorded". Should an "a" be before "repertoire"? (not sure if that's used in classical music circles)
"His discography contains numerous albums and also compliations of compositions by a variety of composers." No need for "also" in this sentence; it's merely an extra word that doesn't add anything after "and".
Second sentence of Overview is lacking a period at the end.
No need for two Sony Classical links in Overview. One will do fine, and interested readers will have already clicked on that. The same applies for stereo links, of which there are currently two. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 02:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Looks very good. Jimknut (talk) 16:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "This final recording consisted of repertoire that he had never previously recorded". Should an "a" be before "repertoire"? (not sure if that's used in classical music circles). I've never seen it written as "a repertoire" in Classical music, just "repertoire".THD3 (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All done, however I agree with User:THD3. Etincelles ^(talk) 18:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.