Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Wiggles discography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

The Wiggles discography edit

Featured list candidates/The Wiggles discography/archive1

Nominator(s): SatDis (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I had success with Hi-5 discography and thought I'd give the same treatment to The Wiggles, also a very popular Australian children's group. They have many more releases so much more to dig into.SatDis (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Ianblair23 (talk) 01:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

:Excellent work SatDis! My comments are below:

Studio albums table:

fix link to Go Bananas!

Compilation albums table:

link Gramophone record

Singles table:

Make the table the same width as other above
A reference is required for the Christmas single year of release
Is there a reason why the label and the format of the singles is missing?
"—" denotes items which were not released... This can be deleted as both singles charted

Notes:

Could you please add a reference for notes b, c and f
Note h – change Apples and Bananas to Apples & Bananas

References:

Ref 52 – fix display of page 7

Categories:

Extra note:

I noticed that both Pop Go the Wiggles! and You Make Me Feel Like Dancing in their respective articles claim to be 31st album to be released by The Wiggles.

Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 12:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the speedy feedback @Ianblair23:. I have addressed the issues as I could. My only troubles are finding a reference for the Christmas Single (however its chart appearance is referenced so I know it existed), and one of the notes: proving the album was not released in Australia (I've proved it existed in the US, but not sure how to go further). As for the extra note, I really haven't been involved in those album articles so I'm not sure! Thanks as always! SatDis (talk) 21:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SatDis, apologies for taking a while to get back to this. Thanks for making the changes. I have fixed up the singles table so that it is the same width as the others. A couple of things:

Please use this ref from Freedb for the Christmas Single release date.
Please add scope="row" to each in row in all of the tables as has been added in singles table.

That should be it. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Thanks Ianblair23 for the ref! I've fixed these up, thankyou for the assistance. SatDis (talk) 04:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Great job SatDis! – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Aoba47 (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments from Aoba47

In the ALT description for the infobox image, I would replace "fan" with "child" as the word "fan" is somewhat unclear.
Since this band still appears to be actively releasing music, I would rephrasing the first sentence to "has released" rather than "have released". The group is treated as a singular entity either so it would make more sense anyway (i.e. It has v.s. They have)
Make sure the citations are in sequential order. For instance, the group of citations at the end of the second paragraph need to be re-arranged completely.
You can just say "highest" as "highest ever" sounds somewhat informal.

SatDis Everything else looks good. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this. Aoba47 (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed ALT description, and "highest ever". Thanks for picking up on the citations - I'm assuming you mean that they should read [1][3][5][6]???

That is correct. Aoba47 (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However I am going to defend the use of the word "have", because in Australian English, band names are treated as noun plurals - meaning "they are" not "it is", and "they have" not "it has". This is what I've been told to follow with Hi-5. But please let me know if there's more to this than I am aware of.

Thank you for the clarification. Aoba47 (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Aoba47 you for looking over the page, it is appreciated. SatDis (talk) 07:17, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Wonderful work with this! Aoba47 (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Carbrera

To be consistent, the "Live albums" section combines "Peak chart position" and "AUS" in one box whereas the other sections separate them; I would separate them here as well

The rest looks great. Carbrera (talk) 01:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks Carbrera for your feedback. I have taken on your suggestion. SatDis (talk) 03:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – thanks for your change. If you are not busy, would you mind taking a look at my FLC as well? I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks and regards, Carbrera (talk) 05:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.