Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Supergrass discography/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 21:11, 15 June 2008 [1].
Supergrass discography edit
previous FLC (04:49, 30 May 2008)
I am resubmitting this discography because I believe it is now up to FL criteria. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 08:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments Looks pretty good. I only have a few concerns/suggestions
Oppose, for now. Due to the below issues remaining unresolved. Drewcifer (talk) 21:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Most of the sales figures don't appear to be cited.
- Why do some of the releases have catalog numbers but some don't?
- Most of the releases now have catalogue numbers. Only the live album, EPs, Soundtrack appearances and the 2 early singles from Supergrass haven't got catalogue numbers. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 10:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved stuff from Drewcifer
- There shouldn't be a space between something and its citation (BPI certifications column) Done --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 00:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Album column in the singles table can merge similar cells. Though I would leave the first two as separate cells. Done --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 01:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry but I do not know what that means. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 10:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Citations #1 and #2 need to give more attribution. #9's publisher should be Irish Recorded Music Association. Done --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 10:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What cat numbers there are aren't consistent: same say "PCS #1234" some just say "#1234". I'd go with the PCS.
- There's no need for the sub-header in the Compilation albums table.
- Do all the EP's titles really say "- EP"?
- According to iTunes they do. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 00:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is still alot of American-style dates.
- I have changed the dates to Day-Month-Year --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 09:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why does one entry all of a sudden have an EAN number? Why is that even needed?
- It's supposed to be some sort of reference because I couldn't find one for that soundtrack. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 00:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Stuff like release dates and labels aren't necessary for singles.
- I'm still not sure about that but if it will make this discography a featured list then I shall remove this info. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 09:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "Information taken from iTunes Store UK ." in the EPs table is not the proper way to cite something. Try and do it via an in-line citation or a general reference.
- Similar columns between tables should be a kept a consistent width whenever possible. Drewcifer (talk) 21:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I made them consistent width earlier but someone changed it back. So I'm not sure what's right... --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 00:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I took a look at indopug's diff, and he was right in making the edits: alot of the added code was redundant. Rowspan=1 and align=left, for instance is unnecessary. So, I'd recommend adding the width="xx" again to the column headers (and only the column headers), and possibly align="center" to each of the year cells. Drewcifer (talk) 02:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- align="center" to each of the year cells is redundant too, since the width of "Year" and "2000" is the same. So the year column is always a tight fit. If you see year columns too wide its because there is an erroneous width somewhere stretching the table; since the other column widths are defined, the Year column is stretched. indopug (talk) 14:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "500,000 + (UK)" – What's the + for? "More than 500,000?" Just put 500,000 since that would be the maximum that has been verified; this goes for all of them.
- Remove extra spaces before references in "Dead Man On Campus OST [22]" and "Chicago Cab OST [23]"
Gary King (talk) 23:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose My reasons below:
- Remove sales figures, these are uncited.
- Singles table does not need all the details, just the name
- Soundtrack appearances are not necessary unless the song did not feature on a Supergrass album/single/release etc.
- Music videos need cites
- EANs are not suitable. Find a catalog number.
- Your assertion that each Supergrass EPs all have the "- EP" suffix is not supported by Allmusic
- What does "Supergrass presents Diamond Hoo Ha Men" mean?
That's all. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 15:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.