Forgot to add, this is a self nom! And that I support this of course.--HamedogTalk|@ 08:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The tables look a bit clumsy, they should be aligned. The logos before the winner also don't look very good and the references section should be organized. Apart from that, the list looks good. Mário 11:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Alinged tables and removed logos. I have come across a problem however, which may only exist on my computer. If you look at 2004, the Brumbies points won't be bolded. Does anyone know how to fix this?--HamedogTalk|@ 12:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Organized the references. Brumbies row still an Issue.--HamedogTalk|@ 12:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It looks good now, I've removed the refs from the headers. About the bold problem, you forgot to "open" the bold before the team name. It is fixed now. One more thing, I think you should add fair use rationale to the badge picture. Mário 13:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
added fair use rationale.--HamedogTalk|@ 15:00, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comprehensive results and a good looking article, nice work Hamedog. Cvene64 21:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Lots of red links in the column. Joe I 10:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, alot of the Super 12 articles haven't been created, but I will try and make a few soon. --HamedogTalk|@ 10:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All those redlinks are now articles, albiet many are stubs.--HamedogTalk|@ 13:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fully Support excellent list with complete and relevant information hoopydinkConas tá tú? 15:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good work on this list, but not sure if the Super 14 champions list should be seperate to this, although there are more teams. OK, leave them seperate. JasrocksTalk 07:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
