Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Shilpa Shetty filmography/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Shilpa Shetty filmography edit

Shilpa Shetty filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My first time nominating a featured anything, so let's not be too rough :) I've worked on revamping this list over the last few weeks and feel that it's up to a pretty good standard. Contains everything needed to become a featured list such as a good lead, sources and a clear table. Criticism, suggesting improvements most welcome. Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
;Comments on the lead
  • There seems to be some strange whitespace at the top
 DoneSpaces removed.
  • Image captions: "Shetty on the sets" => "Shetty on the set" (she was only on one set when the picture was taken)
 Done
  • "Shetty's performance earned her two filmfare nominations" - capital S on Filmfare
 Done
  • "The 2000 Dhadkan" => "The 2000 film Dhadkan"
 Done added action drama
  • "marked turning point" => "marked a turning point"
 Done
  • "under the Best Actress category award ceremonies" => "under the Best Actress category at various awards ceremonies"
 Done
  • "by featuring lead female" - "by featuring as the lead female"
 Done
  • "cop drama" => "police drama" (cop is too slangy)
 Done
  • "earned her nomination" => "earned her a nomination"
 Done
  • "for Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award and for Best Comedian as well." => "for the Filmfare Best Supporting Actress and Best Comedian awards."
    • Actually, is the Best Comedian award a Filmfare award? It doesn't seem to be mentioned in our article on the awards........?
 Done Actually it's best supporting actress. there isn't specific award for comedy
  • "after winning 2007 British reality television series" => "after winning the 2007 British reality television series"
 Done
  • "Shetty made her debut in South Indian cinema through Tamil-language sleeper musical hit action film Mr. Romeo" - a lot going on here. Would be better as "Shetty made her debut in South Indian cinema in the Tamil-language musical action film Mr. Romeo, which proved to be a sleeper hit"
 Done
  • "Shetty afterwards played lead roles" => "Shetty subsequently played lead roles"
 Done
  • "in 2000 action drama Azad starred with" => "in 2000 action drama Azad with"
 Done
  • "She had successful career" => "She had a successful career"
 Done
  • "with three releases like," - I think all this can be condensed to just "with"
 Done
  • "In addition to acting in the films" => "In addition to acting in films"
 Done
  • "Shetty is celebrity endorser" => "Shetty is a celebrity endorser"
 Done
  • "reality shows Zara Nachke Dikha, Nach Baliye, Super Dancer." => "reality shows Zara Nachke Dikha, Nach Baliye and Super Dancer."
 Done already
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
*I will look at the tables at a later date..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
More comments on the lead
  • "Shetty's performance earned her two filmfare nominations" - Filmfare still need to be capitalised
 Done
  • Also, given that you say "two Filmfare nominations", I think you could pipe the actual awards to simply "Lux New Face of the Year" and "Best Supporting Actress"
 Done
  • "Films including action drama Aag, romantic drama Aao Pyaar Karen, comedy Haathkadi, Chhote Sarkar " - needs "and" before the last title
 Done
  • "Her comic performance as an eccentric fisherwoman in 2002 action-drama release Rishtey earned her a nomination for Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award" - needs "the" before Filmfare
 Done
  • Also, the refs at the end of this sentence are either side of the full stop??
 Done
  • "Shetty made her debut in South Indian cinema in the Tamil-language musical action film Mr. Romeo" - film title should be in italics and also wikilinked
 Done
  • "with releases like, Preethsod Thappa" - don't need comma after like
 Done
  • "vocal about the issues" => "vocal about issues"
 Done
  • "Shetty has served as a talent judge for reality shows Zara Nachke Dikha, Nach Baliye, Super Dancer" - need "and" before the last title
 Done
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
*Will look at the tables later -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have noticed that something looks very odd with a lot of the refs, specifically with regard to the "first1" and "last1" fields. As an example you have <ref name="racism">{{cite news |last1=Celebrity |first1=Narratives of |title=Shilpa complains of racism |url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jan/18/bigbrother.raceintheuk |accessdate=9 April 2020 |work=The Guardian |agency=Guardian Media Group |publisher=Guardian Media Group |date=18 January 2007}}</ref>. The "first1" and "last1" fields are used for the name of the author of the source, in this case Stephen Brook. Not sure why you have put the words "Narratives of celebrity", which don't appear anywhere in the source, in those fields......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed some of them. But there are references for example ref # 10, name of the author is missing in links. Kindly suggest what to mention in such cases.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 05:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If there is no named author then just leave those fields blank -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done mate.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 12:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are still many refs where random words are in the first and last fields, e.g. refs 4, 57, 81, 85. There are also quite a lot of refs where the title shown is not the actual title of the source e.g. ref 1, the title is shown as "Shetty ventured into acting in 1993 with Baazigar" but the actual title of the source is "Raj Kundra wants someone to write a book on Shilpa Shetty", similarly for ref 17 the title of the source is "Have Bollywood Celebs Finally Embraced Feminism?" which is nothing like the title shown in the article (the title shown is a fragment of a sentence from somewhere in the middle of the article). Please check all the refs and make sure the correct info is in the correct fields...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Vacant all first and last field. Although, with regards to title name; I have tried to cover most of them but some of refs are having only Shilpa Shetty as their title so I have put some random title. Let me know if missed somewhere.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 06:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If the title of the source is simply "Shilpa Shetty", then that should be the title shown here. You shouldn't just pick a random different title because you think the actual title isn't interesting enough...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
: Done Got it. But just curious is multiple references with same allowed here?--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 14:47, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's perfectly acceptable -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Title of the references have been changed as asked. Please let me know if missed on something.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
;Comments on the tables
  • "Special appearance" is linked the second time it appears - it should be linked the first time
 Done
  • Her role in CBB should just be "herself"
 Done
  • "Kids" is too slangy - change to "children's"
 Done
  • Amazon Prime Video should have a capital on every word
 Done
  • Any reason why the TV table is sortable but the film one is not? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Not really. I actually forgot to make films list sortable.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 07:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now that you have made the films table sortable, you need to edit the directors column so that they sort in surname order, not forename order -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I checked few FLs like Kareena Kapoor filmography. Director column is sorted in forename order. Just curious.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In that case those lists are wrong. See WP:SORT#Specifying_a_sort_key_for_a_cell -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
After writing the above, I checked the Kareena Kapoor list and the director column definitely sorts by surname (e.g. JP Dutta sorts under D) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have made changes as per WP:SORT#Specifying_a_sort_key_for_a_cell. Please check if it's okay.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 12:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What have you changed? I just checked and Anil Sharma still sorts under A, Harry Baweja under H, Vimal Kumar under K, etc. They need to sort based on the surname -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I have just looked and you have put all the sort keys in the wrong place. You have put them right at the start of each row. They need to be against the cell they apply to i.e. the director -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have made the changes. Directors like Priyadarshan, Revathi doesn't have surname mentioned on their respective article, so I have kept the field blank. Please have a look.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 13:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If the person just uses a single name then they should sort on that name. I've fixed that for you -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks mate. Let me know if more work is required. --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 05:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apologies, I forgot to check back. Still a couple of issues with the refs - refs 57 and 78 still have made-up titles. Also, IMDB is not generally considered a reliable source so could do with being replaced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done IMDB refs replaced with news articles, title fixed.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 13:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the name of her roles, you should sort them by last name, other wise it sorts them alphabetically by first name, which is strange. ~ HAL333 23:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Except some of her movies just used a single name.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 07:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose a bit to do here...

(WikiCup entry)

  • "Primarily known" -> "Known primarily".
 Done
  • Why isn't there a music video table?
Actually I referred several list and there is no such table specifically for music videos
  • "Kannada " is piped to a redirect back to itself.
 Done Redirecting to Kannada language
  • " success in her career Shetty's films" in her career is redundant here as it's pretty clear we're talking about her acting career.
 Done
  • "romantic drama" is linked on the second instance.
 Done
  • " films like family" such as, instead of "like".
 Done
  • "Garv: Pride & Honour " uses ampersand, not "and".
 Done
  • Tamil is overlinked.
 Done
  • You link "action film" but previously "action-drama" went unlinked.
 Done Not required to have linked actually so Unlinked.
  • "opposite ... opposite" is repetitive.
 Done
  • "is vocal about issues such as feminism and animal rights" what relevance to this list?
 Done Removed
  • In fact, where are the music videos even mentioned??
While writing I kept Kareena Kapoor filmography in mind. Since there is no mention of special appearance in songs, as a result I have not included.
  • Table needs row scopes.
please help how to do it.
  • No need for refs column to be sortable.
 Done
  • "Abbas-Mustan" needs en-dash.
 Done
  • Sortable tables should link linkable items every time.
Not getting. Can you please help how to do that.
Things like the languages, should be linked every time, not just first time in the table, as it's sortable now there's no guarantee of which one (linked or unlinked) comes first. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 14:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • There appears to be 50 films in the table. Compare that to the value in the infobox.

 Done Table includes special appearances as well, including 51 in total.

  • Why isn't Junoon notable?
Cannot create an article on it as I am not so sure about the movie.
Can still link to a potential article. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 14:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • TV table, don't sort refs and why aren't they centrally aligned like the film table?
 Done
  • Notes don't normally sort as they're prose and sorting is not helpful.
 Done
  • Spaced hyphens should be en-dashes.
 Done

That's it for a quick first pass. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 09:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from — Bilorv (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(Planning to claim WikiCup points for this review.)
  • Em dashes are used where they should be en dash (action—comedy should be action–comedy) or hyphen (top-grossing and Tamil-language), throughout. There's a difference in all three. Bit nuanced, see MOS:ENBETWEEN and MOS:HYPHEN. Hope I've got these right. I think The Rambling Man's comment above was only about the "Notes" column, not the lead text.
 Done ✅
  • "After initial success Shetty's films" – think a comma after "success" would be better phrasing.
 Done ✅
  • Films including action drama Aag, romantic drama Aao Pyaar Karen, comedy Haathkadi and Chhote Sarkar garnered her negative reviews. The Rotten Tomatoes source doesn't actually say this, only mentioning flops around that point. Better referencing mentioning each of the specific films in turn is needed.
 Done ✅ Ref #5 satisfies the claim mate.
  • "Best Actress category at various award ceremonies" – Think it's usually more informative to mention some award names rather than the category alone. Just an illustrative example or two needed here.
 Done ✅
  • "following an international racism controversy" – Sounds like she could have been the racist here. Make it clear she was the subject, e.g. "after comments made by other contestants about Shetty fell afoul of Ofcom rules and sparked an international controversy over racism" (with a ref mentioning Ofcom).
afoul of Ofcom rules Not getting. Can you please elaborate.
See Celebrity Big Brother (British series 5) racism controversy#Ofcom – three scenes breached the rules of the UK television industry's regulatory body. But my broader point is that we need a brief description of what occurred and that description needs to be neutral and factual. — Bilorv (Black Lives Matter) 14:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Understood  Done ✅
 Done ✅
  • "Ref(s)" abbreviation is usually expanded over by hovering via use of {{Abbr|Ref(s)|References}}
 Done ✅
  • The main table should have a caption e.g. using sronly for people who use a screen reader.
 Done ✅
  • Forgive me if it's cultural ignorance on my part, but check that "Role(s)" entries are sorting by the surname and not the given name—"Roma Khurana" looks out of place.
I have been asked by one of editor to mention Roles part be in sort manner.

(Ref numbers as of this permalink.)

  • Refs #7 and #41 should have "Rediff News" as a work rather than "Rediff" as a publisher. Refs #20, #21 also look like they should have website names in italics.
 Done ✅
  • Ref #11, Metro, is red at WP:RSP, very much not appropriate for sensitive race-related topics like this. Can just be removed.
 Done ✅
  • Ref #13 doesn't verify that Mr. Romeo was a sleeper hit.
 Done ✅ Actually, a tamil movie review website claims but not sure if the website is right ref so avoided adding it.
If no reliable sources says it then we can't either. — Bilorv (Black Lives Matter) 14:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref #30 and #44 are "Filmibeat", not "Filmy Beat" (and I think should be in italics).
It gives error stating Italics not allowed.
Right, so you need to use the |work parameter rather than the |publisher parameter.
 Not done still getting this error.
Using the |work parameter formats the text entered in italics, as in the other references. — Bilorv (talk) 16:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mate I was wondering if it's mandatory to use italics. I checked Kareena Kapoor filmography, there is |publisher in most of references.
We use italics for news source titles and non-italics for publishers e.g. The Guardian is the name of a newspaper (published by the Guardian Media Group) but BBC is the name of a company. — Bilorv (talk) 09:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Got it mate. Please check and let me know if any more improvements required.
  • Ref #36 says Pardesi Babu was 2005, not 1998. Which date is right?
1998. I am sorry but what part of ref saying 2005?
"Pardesi Babu / Release date: 02 December, 2005", right at the top. — Bilorv (Black Lives Matter) 14:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please check now if it's done. ✅
  • Unlink Deccan Herald (ref #78) and Firstpost (ref #80) for consistency with the rest of the reference section.
 Done ✅
  • Ref #81 is a press release from 2018 but it doesn't say the show premiered in 2018.
 Done ✅ Added a new ref with premier date.
  • No issues found in spotchecks on refs #34, #55, #63, #67, #75, #80. Sources other than Metro all look reliable.

Thanks for your work on this list so far. — Bilorv (Black Lives Matter) 22:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Pardesi Babu source still reports conflicting information so we need an additional source confirming which is the correct date. Ref #5 does not satisfy the claim Films including action drama Aag, romantic drama Aao Pyaar Karen, comedy Haathkadi and Chhote Sarkar garnered her negative reviews because it only mentions gross income, nothing to do with reviews. The "sleeper hit" information seems to come from a non-reliable source not cited in the article, which violates WP:V. Also, sparked an international racism controversy over racism can just be sparked an international controversy over racism and Filmibeat is still spelled incorrectly. I've made a lot of replies and still a lot of issues are not being substantively addressed so I will have to reluctantly oppose in a few days unless these issues can be solved by the nominator. — Bilorv (talk) 16:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Added new source with respect to release date of Pardesi Babu. Done ✅
Aag, romantic drama Aao Pyaar Karen, comedy Haathkadi and Chhote Sarkar garnered her negative reviews Have mentioned films box office status, I could not find reliable source that could prove review of her performance. Done ✅
Again I could not find reliable source so removed "sleeper hit". Done ✅
'sparked an international controversy over racism'  Done ✅
Filmibeat corrected  Done ✅
I have rectified all the issues highlighted. Sorry it took longer than expected.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 06:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, including on sourcing (spotchecks done): all issues have now been addressed. — Bilorv (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Director comment – I was asked to come here and address the fact that TRM's oppose has remained intact despite responses to most of his concerns. Upon looking at the list, there are a couple of issues that remain unaddressed. The big one is that row scopes are still not in the tables, which goes against style guidelines. Mahesh Babu filmography, another page currently at FLC, has row scopes included, so that could serve as an article that will show you the formatting required. Also, TRM commented that sortable tables should have repeated links when possible. It wouldn't concern me much to leave the language links as is, but the directors and awards should probably be linked in each appearance. Just adding links to the cells that don't already have them would be enough to fix the issue. Giants2008 (Talk) 19:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done ✅ Hi @Giants2008: I have included row scopes in both the tables.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 13:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Giants2008: Few directors have not been linked because there isn't an article on them. Is it okay to link awards in same table twice?
Resolved comments from MWright96 (talk) 07:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
;Comments by MWright96
  • Delink businesswoman because it is a common term
    •  Done ✅
  • "Known primarily for her work in Hindi films," - not a fan of using the term Known for; how about She primarly works in Hindi films,
    •  Done ✅
  • "she has also appeared in Telugu, Tamil and Kannada films." - better; and has also appeared in Telugu, Tamil and Kannada films.
    •  Done ✅
  • Wikilink Filmfare to Filmfare Awards
    •  Done ✅
  • "Films including action drama" - better; Films Shetty starred in including action drama
    •  Done ✅
  • Romantic drama does not need to be linked
    •  Done ✅
  • Wikilink Zee Gold Bollywood Awards to Gold Awards
    •  Not done To my knowledge Zee Gold Bollywood Awards is given to performance is films and Gold Awards is given to performance in television. Shetty received the award for the movie. So cannot link to Gold Awards. Correct if wrong.
  • "earning her several nominations under the Best Actress category" - in the
    •  Done ✅
  • "after comments made by other contestants about Shetty fell afoul of Ofcom rules" - due to comments about her made by other contestants broke Ofcom rules
    •  Done ✅
  • Wikilink Ofcom
    •  Done ✅
  • "and sparked an" - more formal; caused an
    •  Done ✅
  • "Shetty made her debut in South Indian cinema in the Tamil-language musical action film Mr. Romeo." - in which year?
    •  Done ✅
  • "She had a successful career in Kannada cinema with releases like" - such as
    •  Done ✅
  • Both tables need to include the scope"row" field for all of the rows to meet MOS:DTT
    •  Done ✅
  • Ref 1 is missing the date it was the published and the agency that provided NDTV with the story
    •  Done ✅
  • Ref 3 is missing the date The Times of India published the story
    • Published date is there 24 September 2019 in the reference.
  • Ref 12 is from the Metro, which is not considered generally reliable per WP:RSPSOURCES
    •  Done ✅ That's strange.
  • Refs 17, 50 are missing Press Trust of India as the agency for the respective stories
    • Ref 17 story belongs to IANS agency and mentioned already. Ref 50 is from Bollywood Hungama.
  • Ref 18 is missing Indo-Asian News Service as the agency
    • Ref 18 is a story covered by HT correspondent. Nothing to do with Indo-Asian News Service.
  • Ref 21 is dead and will need archiving or replacing
    • It's not dead rather still accessible.
  • Refs 22, 44 and 73 needs the date the respective sources was published
    •  Done ✅ for ref 73. For Refs 22, 44 Bollywood Hungama doesn't publish date.
  • Ref 44 title: "She had a successful career in Kannada cinema with releases like" - the title is missing the words "Happy Birthday Shilpa Shetty:" at the beginning of it
    • Ref 44 is for Lal Badshah. Nothing is mentioned the sentence you wrote.
  • The link for Ref 71 needs to be fixed because it links to the wrong article
    • No, ref is linked to correct article. However there was problem with title of ref. Fixed.
  • Ref 79 is a duplicate of Ref 11 and will need to be deleted
    • Ref 79 is from Deccan Herald. Ref 11 is from The Financial Express (India).
  • The date formats for Refs 81 and 82 should not include the parentheses
    •  Done ✅

Plenty of work to do to get this list up to the necessary standard. MWright96 (talk) 08:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @MWright96: Thanks a lot for pointing it out. I will work diligently to resolve issues occurring in order to get the list to necessary standard.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 06:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MWright96: 25 Cents FC appears to have addressed or responded to all of your points; are you satisfied with their responses? --PresN 20:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - Pass edit

Doing now. Aza24 (talk) 23:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why is there a parenthesis in ref 19's title?
  •  Done
  • When I clicked on ref 20 it wouldn't go to a specific page, just went to the home?
  •  Done Added new ref
  • Ref 21 missing date
  •  Done

That's all I got, consistency and reliability looks good for the rest. I linked some publishers since only some were linked, take a look at the refs and double check that all publishers/works who have a WP article are linked. Aza24 (talk) 23:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --PresN 14:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Shilpa_Shetty_filmography/archive1&oldid=976064242"