Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Rani Mukerji filmography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hahc21 00:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC) [1]].[reply]

Rani Mukerji filmography edit

Featured list candidates/Rani Mukerji filmography/archive1

Nominator(s): KRIMUK90 ✉ 08:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this because I feel that it meets the criteria for being a featured list. After taking her biography to FA-status, I feel proud to have worked on her filmography as well. I look forward to a lot of constructive comments. Thank you. KRIMUK90 ✉ 08:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from —Vensatry _(Ping) 12:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from —Vensatry _(Ping)

"star Aamir Khan" are you referring to him as star or I'm missing something here?

Removed "star".

"In 1998 she received public recognition ..." sentence looks too long. Consider splitting them

Done.

I'd like to see a mention of Hey Ram and Paheli in the lead as both were critical successes. This being a filmography page, I think there is no harm in mentioning films that were critically acclaimed irrespective of Mukherjee's performance in these films.

I agree. Mentioned both the films.

You could add the names of directors of Bombay Talkies, probably as a foot note.

Added footnote.

Doesn't she portray herself as Neetu Singh in "Phir Milenge Chalte Chalte"?

She doesn't exactly portray Neetu Singh. The song was meant as a tribute to the yesteryear actors and her look was just based on Singh's.

- Good work overall! I'd be happy to support this once I get clarified with my comments. —Vensatry _(Ping) 08:19, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the comments Vensatry. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 08:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Nice list! No further queries —Vensatry _(Ping) 12:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Much appreciated. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 12:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support The issues I could see previously seem to have all been identified by Vensatry and addressed. A good clean looking list which should quite rightly be promoted.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, Blofeld. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 14:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it's been a while since the last support. Does anyone else have any other comments? Thanks. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 02:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite surprising that this Bollywood list hasn't attracted many reviewers. Perhaps, you should invite editors to comment here. —Vensatry _(Ping) 10:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: No other problems found. Great work!

--Birdienest81 (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Birdienest.-- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: As always, a job well done by User:Krimuk90! Keep it up bud! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 13:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Bollywood Dreamz. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 13:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I seriously looked for the last two hours, scrutinizing and analyzing the sources, the content and the validations, however, nada. Couldn't find anything that needs changing, tweaking etc. All around exceptional work. Congratulations and I would be happy to see this list being promoted. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton Indian Bio.

-- KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.