Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of works by William Monahan

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 06:15, 5 January 2008.

List of works by William Monahan edit

Hello: I recently nominated here at FLC, and the conclusion was that this list of works was more article than list and belonged at FAC. At FAC it was decided that although the list had a lot of prose, it was at its heart a list plus prose and belonged here at FLC. Please see the below pages for the complete discussion:

It has received several Supports over at FAC and has already had a peer review. I hope that FLC can expand upon their conception of a list and include this annotated bibliography amongst their featured content. BillDeanCarter (talk) 04:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support My what a history this list has. Reading the Article Milestones took me almost as long as reading the list itself. Wikipedia isn't sure what to make of it (delete it or praise it, and where?) This is an impressive list and a mine of information for anyone researching the author. I doubt if anyone on wiki other than the nominator knows if it is comprehensive but it appears to be thorough. It most certainly meets the criteria, being an example of "very best work". I have one request: move the external links to online editions out of the body text (per WP:EL and WP:NOT#LINK). The List of works by Joseph Priestley links to online versions within a specific External links section. An alternative may be some abbreviated form such as you have done in the Notes section. I know, in this case, they are a minority of the works, but I'm concerned we set a precedent and that an author whose works are mostly online might result in a list full of external links coming to FAC. Oh, and in the "External links" section, you have an interview by Monahan of someone else. What is that doing here? Colin°^Talk 11:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. There was a discussion about linking directly to articles in a bibliography within another article I worked on for novelist Bruno Maddox and it was decided that there was nothing wrong with it. It makes it easier to access the online articles for reading and adds useful additional information, such as whether the article is actually available. I added the "External links" section late, because I wasn't sure where the interview should go. If it doesn't belong at all I will rapidly remove it, because I didn't think it was correct to include other interviews with Monahan himself. I don't know if conducting an interview is considered a work by an author.-BillDeanCarter (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Small point of information: The reason I linked the Priestley works in another section is because most of them are not links to first editions of the works and the list is a list of first editions, so the links would not have been to the same edition of the work. Awadewit | talk 18:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support I would like to reiterate my support once more for this carefully-constructed, meticulously researched, and eminently helpful annotated bibliography. As I have repeatedly said, this is the best list of works that I have seen on Wikipedia and it should surely be featured. Awadewit | talk 18:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support for a beautiful piece of work. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Simply great. Good work. Rt . 20:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This should have been featured almost a month ago. The amazing dedication to this work really shines considering the ordeal this was put through for the past month. -MBK₀₀₄ 20:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks all. A minor ordeal but usually there are plenty of good suggestions along the way that help to improve the article anyhow.-BillDeanCarter (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Per all the above praises. This list sets a new high standard!--Yannismarou (talk) 13:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.