Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of poker hands/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was unsuccessful by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 10:49:23 11 May 2019 (UTC) [1].

List of poker hands edit

Featured list candidates/List of poker hands/archive1

Featured list removal candidates/List of poker hands/archive1

Nominator(s): Hpesoj00 (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe the article to be of great interest to many readers, and I have no doubt it is referenced by many poker players. I revamped the article approximately two years ago hoping to get it to FLC, but it did not pass because of the low number of reviews (partially because I didn't have the time to make reviews for reciprocation). I certainly believe the article is of high quality, and if it isn't ready to be a FL, I would certainly like to know what needs to be improved (it has already been through peer review in pretty much its current state). Hpesoj00 (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The first thing that jumped out me was a "citation needed" tag against a statement - that definitely needs addressing......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. Hpesoj00 (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I forgot to check back. My only other comments are about a couple of references:
- What makes codethrowdown.com a reliable source? I would check the content but I am at work and browser security settings have blocked it, which isn't a good sign.....
- The ref entitled "How many poker hands are there?" lists no work or publisher, however a quick check indicates that it seems to just be some random person';s blog and therefore not a reliable source
Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hpesoj00: are you still active? I notice you haven't edited for more than two weeks..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am still active. Thanks for the feedback. I will attempt to address in short order. Have been rather busy recently. Hpesoj00 (talk) 12:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hpesoj00 Are you returning to this? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I did not get an opportunity to revisit this. It turned out to be bad timing. Perhaps I will try again in the future when I am more sure that I will have the time to follow through. Thanks for your time and patience nonetheless. Hpesoj00 (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been unsuccessful, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.