Comments
- "Shoaib Akhtar, a Pakistani cricketer" since Akhtar has retired from Intn'l cricket, the opeinign phrase needs clarification and a mention of same should be made in the article
- Link Imran, Wasim and Waqar, as non-familiar readers may not know about them
- I think he was always referred by his last name
- He is referred by his first name. See here
- May be, but it's a general practice to use the last name —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure about that. Zia Khan 17:55, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "five-wicket hauls takers", this sounds new to me
- Nothing new, s removed from hauls
- Is mdy the predominant date format used in Pakistan
- Date format doesn't matter, you can use any of them. I switched to dmy.
- Alt is confusing. You mean is he wearing the uniform after delivering the ball?
- Is wickets col. the best to define the scope
- I don't think it's necessary to use since there is not such independently important column in fifers lists —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, of course wickets column is the best since this is his fifers list.
- Wickets column is most similar to the fifers. Zia Khan 17:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You have used {{double-dagger}} in the key but used that anywhere in the table, inspite of the fact that Akhtar has claimed two ten wicket hauls
- Correct the caption of the ODI table
- No need for a separate column for refs. as there is sufficient space in the result column
- One can have a separate column in the table. I've merged the columns.
- The "batsmen" col. in the ODI table looks cluttered
- How can someone play two ODIs at different venues on the same day
- My mistake, corrected. Zia Khan 16:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
—Vensatry (Ping me) 08:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Further comments
- Result for
the Pakistan in that match
- A period is the end of everything. Only refs should come after that
- "ten or more wickets per match twice" add something like in his international career at the end
- "Shoaib's first
was five-wicket haul was". This sentence needs to be slightly re-written
- "His career-best bowling" add something like figures/performance. Again a re-write is required here
- Abbreviate Twenty20 International
- Not required because I've used this just 1 time.
- Since both the tables have the same no. of columns, I'd prefer the same width for all columns in both the tables
- See NapHit's comment, and if you could do something with this?
- The batsmen column for the ODI table is too small. Use the same values of the Test table —Vensatry (Ping me) 20:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This value is greater than Test column, check it again. Zia Khan 23:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you haven't got my point. The column appears to be small because you've used larger values for other columns. Just duplicate the values of the Test table —Vensatry (Ping me) 15:49, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand you, I changed the values but it doesn't work and the column appears at it was earlier. Hope you understand my point. Zia Khan 23:19, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- When you add "One of two five-wicket hauls by Shoaib in a match" in the table "10 wickets or more taken in the match" is not really needed
- He took 6 wickets in the 1st innings and 4 wickets in the 2nd against Bangladesh.
- Richard Jones is a dab
- In the ODI table, Robbie Hat links to a football referee of the same name
- Franklin was a substitute in the second game
- I didn't get you. Zia Khan 15:57, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If you check the scorecard, it was Ian Butler who was dismissed by Akhtar in his second ODI five-wicket haul —Vensatry (Ping me) 20:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
—Vensatry (Ping me) 06:57, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I missed out a point in the quote. Since they've used only the first names (I'm talking about Akram, Imran and Waqar), pipelink them accordingly —Vensatry (Ping me) 20:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|